Comments on: Peter Gleick: The Best Argument Against Global Warming http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2010/world/peter-gleick-the-best-argument-against-global-warming/ Reporting the Global Water Crisis Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:22:57 +0000 hourly 1 By: Joseph Oruoch http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2010/world/peter-gleick-the-best-argument-against-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-15678 Joseph Oruoch Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:18:00 +0000 http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/?p=12989#comment-15678 Hi Peter, I came across your writing and felt it necessary to refer you to an alternative theory that accounts for all climate change phenomena right from the ice ages through the temperate climates to what we are witnessing today. You will find this on http://www.climatechange.epitomeillustrations.com. It should settle all the issues you have raised and it is worth reading. Please read. Joseph Hi Peter,

I came across your writing and felt it necessary to refer you to an alternative theory that accounts for all climate change phenomena right from the ice ages through the temperate climates to what we are witnessing today. You will find this on http://www.climatechange.epitomeillustrations.com. It should settle all the issues you have raised and it is worth reading. Please read.

Joseph

]]> By: Dano http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2010/world/peter-gleick-the-best-argument-against-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-10573 Dano Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:14:56 +0000 http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/?p=12989#comment-10573 The "science is “settled” " talking point was created by Frank Luntz in 2002. Funny. Best, D The “science is “settled” ” talking point was created by Frank Luntz in 2002.

Funny.

Best,

D

]]> By: James Reznich http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2010/world/peter-gleick-the-best-argument-against-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-10358 James Reznich Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:58:05 +0000 http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/?p=12989#comment-10358 Such a puzzlement. It will be little cosolation when we're kicked off the planet by the natural systems that govern all life while we were busy arguing over what percent of climate change was caused by human activity. I propose a simpler measure. Do only things that enhance the sustainability of the natural environment, humans being an integral part of the system. Things like strip mining and text messages converting to voice don't make the list (what would we do if we actually had to speak to the person we were with?). I'm certain that natural systems will make mining by-waste fertile enough to grow food, but it may take a few thousand years to remediate. Such a puzzlement. It will be little cosolation when we’re kicked off the planet by the natural systems that govern all life while we were busy arguing over what percent of climate change was caused by human activity.
I propose a simpler measure. Do only things that enhance the sustainability of the natural environment, humans being an integral part of the system. Things like strip mining and text messages converting to voice don’t make the list (what would we do if we actually had to speak to the person we were with?). I’m certain that natural systems will make mining by-waste fertile enough to grow food, but it may take a few thousand years to remediate.

]]> By: Jan http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2010/world/peter-gleick-the-best-argument-against-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-10305 Jan Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:10:50 +0000 http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/?p=12989#comment-10305 Another excuse. "The science is young." The science is not young. We have known the properties of CO2 as a heat trapping gas since the 1800s. We have been monitoring it a Mauna Loa since the 1950s. So just when to those who continue to deny this WILL it be considered not young? Another excuse. “The science is young.” The science is not young. We have known the properties of CO2 as a heat trapping gas since the 1800s. We have been monitoring it a Mauna Loa since the 1950s. So just when to those who continue to deny this WILL it be considered not young?

]]> By: Troy http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2010/world/peter-gleick-the-best-argument-against-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-10290 Troy Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:21:17 +0000 http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/?p=12989#comment-10290 Perhaps because climate scientists are having diffuculties themselves coming up with solid evidence that humans are actually causing climate change. The climate has changed long before humans existed and it will continue to change whether humans are here or not. I LOVE science, but this science is very, very young and A LOT still needs to be researched and learned. But to base HUGE decisions, agendas and claim the science is "settled" is beyond ignorance. Perhaps because climate scientists are having diffuculties themselves coming up with solid evidence that humans are actually causing climate change. The climate has changed long before humans existed and it will continue to change whether humans are here or not.

I LOVE science, but this science is very, very young and A LOT still needs to be researched and learned. But to base HUGE decisions, agendas and claim the science is “settled” is beyond ignorance.

]]> By: Peter Gleick: The best argument against global warming | Circle of … | the world cares.com http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2010/world/peter-gleick-the-best-argument-against-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-10286 Peter Gleick: The best argument against global warming | Circle of … | the world cares.com Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:45:09 +0000 http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/?p=12989#comment-10286 [...] here: Peter Gleick: The best argument against global warming | Circle of … Tags: around-the-world, climate, evidence, explaining-the-evidence, scientific-argument, [...] [...] here: Peter Gleick: The best argument against global warming | Circle of … Tags: around-the-world, climate, evidence, explaining-the-evidence, scientific-argument, [...]

]]>