Circle of Blue
  • Podcasts
  • Great Lakes
    • Fresh
    • Harmful Algal Blooms
    • Water’s True Cost
    • Michigan’s Groundwater Emergency
  • Drying American West
  • Water Debt
  • WASH
  • WaterNews
    • WaterNews
      • The Daily Stream
      • Federal Water Tap
      • Fresh
      • Weekly Water Newsletter
      • HotSpots H2O
      • Special Reports
        • Water, Texas
        • Tapped Out
        • Legionnaires’
        • Fair Bluff
        • After Paradise Burned
        • Water Pricing
        • Water Affordability
        • Water Scarcity in India
        • Groundwater
        • Delhi Waits For Water
      • Convenings
  • Features
    •  
      • The Biggest Dry: Arizona
      • Nebraska Nitrate Contamination
      • Lake Mead
      • Water and Financial Risks
      • California Drought
      • Septic Infrastructure in the U.S.
      • Stranded Assets
      • Cape Town
      • Flint Water Crisis
      • Australia
      • Hidden Waters, Dragons in the Deep
      • Himalayas
      • Designing Waters Future
      • Zeropolis
        • Big Cities, Little Water
      • Water and Climate
      • Unearthing Water Risks of The Global Mining Industry
      • Chennai
  • Choke Point
    • The World at a Choke Point
      • Choke Point: Australia
      • Choke Point: Tamil Nadu
      • Choke Point: South Africa
      • Choke Point: China
      • Choke Point: India
      • Choke Point: Australia
      • Choke Point: Tehuacán Valley
      • Choke Point: U.S.
        • Choke Point: Index
          • California Central Valley
          • Great Lakes Algae
          • Ogallala Aquifer
          • Water Data
  • About
    • Fellowship
    • About Circle of Blue
    • Team Members
    • We’re Hiring
    • Board of Directors
    • Ethics and Sponsorship
    • Internships
    • Underwriters
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Michigan’s ‘Very Big Opportunity’ in Infrastructure Windfall

More communities gain access to the largest federal infusion in a half century.

Throughout the Great Lakes region and across the U.S., water systems are aging. In some communities, this means water bills that residents can’t afford or water that’s unsafe to drink. It means that vulnerable systems are even more at risk in a changing climate. From shrinking cities and small towns to the comparatively thriving suburbs, the true cost of water has been deferred for decades.

As the nation prepares to pour hundreds of billions of federal dollars into rescuing water systems, the Great Lakes News Collaborative investigates the true cost of water in Michigan. 

This is part nine of a ten-part series.

By Brett Walton, Circle of Blue – May 11, 2022

In a 15-year career, Kelly Green has worked at the junction of finance and infrastructure, helping to convert state and federal dollars to provide clean drinking water and keep sewage out of waterways.

Central to that work at the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy and its predecessor agency is a state-federal partnership to finance water infrastructure at affordable rates. Called the state revolving funds, the SRFs are now taking a starring role in renewing the nation’s water systems. They are the primary channel through which billions of dollars from the federal infrastructure bill will be directed to states and then to communities. 

As the administrator since 2018 of EGLE’s water infrastructure financing section, the unit that oversees the SRFs in Michigan, Green is in a position to guide decisions that will influence the quality of the state’s water systems as communities look to reverse the decades-long decline in fundamental public works. 

Green calls the momentous increase in capital spending for water “a very big opportunity” that also required equally significant changes in how the agency considers and approves applications for grants. The deteriorated condition of the state’s water infrastructure was not helped at all by decades of administrative and legal impediments that constrained SRF grant approvals and hindered the ability of smaller, low-income communities to access the funds. 

In a series of conversations with community members, engineers, utility staff, and legislative aides, Green and her colleagues learned that EGLE and its predecessor agency had been marketing the SRFs to communities as a “program of last resort,” she said. EGLE made it clear that community water system managers should look elsewhere for financing. They were directed to approach the state for SRF loans if other options fell through. 

It became clear that Michigan’s management of the vital funding program required a makeover. 

“The biggest change that we made internally was basically a culture change,” Green said. “So instead of trying to find ways to say ‘No,’ we changed our culture and tried to find ways to say ‘Yes’ to communities and try to help them get into the program.”

The culture change came just in time. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, approved by Congress and signed by President Biden last November, provides roughly $50 billion over five years for water and sewer systems, the largest federal infusion in the sector in a half century. More than $43 billion of that total will flow through the SRFs, a move that propels the water account into the spotlight in every state. 

Michigan is set to receive more than $1 billion over the next five years, significantly boosting the state’s lending capacity. The federal funds are an opportunity to reinvest in essential public works without saddling residents with all of the costs.

All told, it is a make-or-break moment for the SRFs. The next few years are a chance to accelerate work on removing lead service lines, stanching sewage overflows into rivers and lakes, and fixing some of Michigan’s most entrenched water problems. The relative windfall will assist with capital improvements even as utilities and state agencies must contend with rising project costs and staffing limitations due to inflation and labor shortages. 

Jeff Dietlin, director of utilities for Cadillac, Michigan, stands inside a new pump house built as part of the city’s East 44 Road well field project. The city received a $9.8 million low-interest loan from the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund to finance the project. Photo © J. Carl Ganter / Circle of Blue

More Demand Than Dollars

Stalwarts of federal infrastructure financing, the SRFs have been the primary vehicle for federal funding of water and sewer systems since the Reagan administration, when grant programs for sewage treatment facilities were phased out in favor of low-interest loans. Congress established the Clean Water SRF in 1987. The Drinking Water SRF followed in 1996.

The SRFs are called revolving funds because loan and interest repayments return to the fund to be loaned out once again. Over more than three decades, the SRFs have received reliable congressional support: a total of $48.1 billion for the clean water fund and $23.6 billion for drinking water. Those dollars have been leveraged with state contributions (a required 20 percent match) and other funding sources to finance more than $202 billion nationwide in water system improvements. Michigan has financed just under $7 billion in SRF projects since 1988.

Green said the federal infrastructure bill is a welcomed opportunity to address decades of neglect. But spread across the state, the outlay is hardly enough compared to the extensive need in Michigan for sewers that do not spill human waste into rivers and water mains that do not rupture in freezing temperatures.

“I think that it’s somewhat of a drop in the bucket, which is hard to say when you’re thinking of it in large dollars,” Green said about the federal infrastructure funds. “But the needs are out there are very great.”

There is more demand for SRF dollars in Michigan than EGLE can supply. Last year was the first year that Green remembers not having enough funding for all the projects that applied. She attributes the upwelling of demand to the Flint crisis, which made water infrastructure a headline issue, and to the state’s strict lead and copper rule, which requires all lead service lines to be removed by 2045.

The supply-demand problem is not disappearing, either. The initial step in the SRF process is signaling an intent to apply. For fiscal year 2023, Michigan utilities indicated interest in $1.1 billion from both the drinking water fund and $1.7 billion from the clean water fund. Even with the influx of federal dollars, Green said that the agency can only fulfill a fraction of the requests. For the clean water fund, it has $881 million to distribute. The number of utilities that file formal applications, due this summer, will determine how many projects can be funded. But for drinking water, only $256.5 million is available. Many communities will certainly have to look elsewhere.

“That’s a huge chunk of projects that are still getting left out of the revolving fund program,” Green said.

The federal infrastructure bill is an opportunity to accelerate work on some of Michigan’s most entrenched water problems. But even a historic federal influx will not address all of the state’s extensive water system needs. Photo © J. Carl Ganter / Circle of Blue

Impassable Process

Historically, Michigan has not spread its SRF loans widely. A report from the University of Michigan and the Environmental Policy Innovation Center examined SRF distributions by state between 2011 and 2020. The report placed Michigan last nationally in the percentage of water systems that had received an SRF loan.

Sara Hughes, one of the report authors and an assistant professor at the University of Michigan, said that the state’s bottom ranking reflects a strategy of awarding a smaller number of larger grants — which generally go to larger utilities. Bringing smaller systems into the mix, she said, will require a shift in approach.

“I think it’ll be a lift for a lot of states, but especially in a state like Michigan, where we have traditionally channeled larger funds to fewer systems, there’s going to have to be a different decision-making system in place,” Hughes said.

Notably, the infrastructure law stipulates that 49 percent of the funds must be distributed to “disadvantaged communities” in the form of grants or forgivable loans — an even sweeter deal for these places because they would not have to repay the money. Disadvantaged communities are the high-poverty areas that in the past have not had steady access to SRF financing and whose hobbled water and sewer systems could use a discounted makeover. 

Michigan has financed just under $7 billion in State Revolving Fund projects since 1988. Benefiting from the fund’s low-interest loans, these projects are designed to improve drinking water, sewer, and stormwater systems. Photo © J. Carl Ganter / Circle of Blue

Change in Approach


EGLE hopes to accomplish that pivot with other adjustments that were identified during the community conversations that began six years ago. The department needs legislative approval for these changes because they are written in state law.

One adjustment aims to cut down on paperwork. Typically when communities apply for an SRF loan they are required to submit an extensive document called a project plan. The plan outlines 20-year infrastructure needs, project alternatives, technical reviews, and engineering analysis. Some of this material might be included in other documents but the only way to apply for an SRF loan is to pull it together in a project plan. To submit it to the state, communities have to hire a consulting engineer, a licensed professional who can charge $10,000 to $50,000 for the service.

“That’s a lot of not only upfront cost, but it’s a lot of work for the community to even go out and solicit an engineer to put that document together for them,” Green said. “So that really wasn’t working for the community either.”

Though engineering firms are not cheap, Owen Roberts, the finance director for Cadillac, said that their expertise was “invaluable” in helping the northwest Michigan community with its SRF application last year.

EGLE is now asking the Legislature to approve procedural changes that would allow communities to access the SRFs without having to submit a project plan. Other planning documents would be accepted instead. The change is included in a series of three bipartisan bills that were introduced in March in the House of Representatives. Green called the proposed changes a “win-win situation for everybody.”

The other important adjustment is to the evaluation process. Like a teacher grading student essays, EGLE “scores” the SRF applications based on a rubric. A community already violating drinking water standards gets more points than one proposing a project to maintain its good standing. A larger community receives more points than a smaller community. Having a plan to protect your source water from contamination earns you points. Once the points from these and other categories are added up, projects with higher scores get funded.

The process works until it doesn’t. Replacing lead service lines, for instance, is a top priority for the state, which wants all lines removed by 2045, and for the federal government, which allocated $15 billion nationally in the infrastructure bill to the task. But under the current criteria, Green said that a community applying for funds only to replace lead lines would score very low. 

“So a lot of these small communities that are doing lead service and replacement work only, don’t rank high enough, right now, for us to even get money to them,” Green explained. It’s a problem the proposed legislation would allow EGLE to address.

If the Legislature acts on the bills this year, Green said that 2024 would be the earliest in which the new rules could be applied to SRF funding. A provision in the bills would allow EGLE to update the criteria itself, to reflect changing needs and priorities. Another provision would authorize EGLE to set lower interest rates for disadvantaged communities, a benefit that the U.S. Department of Agriculture already provides for its rural water infrastructure loan program.

In Cadillac, Michigan, the city has installed three new wells at East 44 Road and is building new maintenance facilities and water department offices. Photo © J. Carl Ganter / Circle of Blue

Expanding Access

New support structures are being erected at EGLE to take advantage of federal dollars. The infrastructure bill allows the state environment agency to use 2 percent of the funds for public outreach. Smaller communities may be more familiar with the grant and loan program operated by the USDA, which caters to rural areas.

Outside of government, the Michigan Municipal League Foundation developed a toolkit for assisting disadvantaged communities in applying for federal infrastructure funds. These communities often are unfamiliar with the paperwork requirements or do not have the staff expertise to hunt down and apply for grants. They might not know how to comply with federal rules, such as those mandating American-made materials for construction. The toolkit was underwritten in part by the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, which also funded the Water’s True Cost reporting project.

The administrative work taking place in Lansing might seem arcane. But it is intended to have real-world impact. The experience in Cadillac, a city of 10,400 people in Wexford County, illustrates the possibilities.

For years, the city supplied its drinking water from a well field on 8th Street. The field, however, was surrounded by a Superfund toxic waste site. In 1993, the industrial solvent TCE was found in one of the seven 8th Street wells. Cadillac incrementally began shifting its drinking water supply to areas not threatened by automotive degreasers leaking from Kysor Corporation’s waste lagoons. 

To completely cut ties with 8th Street, the city needed new well sites. Cadillac’s finance director, Owen Roberts, searched for a low-cost loan to complete the work. Weighing his options, Roberts knew where to look. A decade ago Cadillac received a low-interest SRF loan to build a new well field at Crosby Road. 

Last year, Roberts again applied for SRF financing, this time to build three wells at East 44 Road, plus a transmission main to connect the wells to Cadillac’s water distribution system. The project on the south side of town would complete the three-decade transition away from the compromised 8th Street site.

The application paid off. EGLE approved a 30-year, $9.8 million SRF loan for the East 44 Road project. Thanks to a 2.125 percent interest rate, an average water bill in the city is expected to increase by only $2 per month. Cadillac residents benefit not only from the low interest rate but the duration of the loan as well, Roberts said. A commercial loan would charge an interest rate two or three times higher. A tax bond wouldn’t extend payments over three decades.

Construction is expected to be completed in August or September, though that depends on supply chains and inflation, Roberts said. The timeline has already been pushed back three months.

Roberts would prefer not to borrow money for the well field. But if a loan is the only option, then the SRF, for Cadillac and many places like it, is the best choice available. “This is a good one,” he said about the program. “Absolutely.”

Water’s True Cost

The Great Lakes News Collaborative includes Bridge Michigan; Circle of Blue; Great Lakes Now at Detroit Public Television; and Michigan Radio, Michigan’s NPR News Leader; who work together to bring audiences news and information about the impact of climate change, pollution, and aging infrastructure on the Great Lakes and drinking water. This independent journalism is supported by the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation. Find all the work here.

Read the full series

After Decades of Neglect, Bill Coming Due for Michigan’s Water Infrastructure

May 2, 2022
Federal and state governments begin to reverse course on underinvestment to address water’s true cost.
https://i0.wp.com/www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/2022-04-14-Michigan-Waters-True-Cost-JGanter-1502-Edit-2500.jpg?fit=1600%2C912&ssl=1 912 1600 Brett Walton https://www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Circle-of-Blue-Water-Speaks-600x139.png Brett Walton2022-05-02 07:18:482022-12-09 10:52:35After Decades of Neglect, Bill Coming Due for Michigan’s Water Infrastructure

Many Rural Towns Have Neglected Drinking Water Systems for Decades

May 3, 2022
As some rural towns lose population and government funds shrink, some drinking water systems are one failure away from crisis.
https://i0.wp.com/www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2022-04-16-Michigan-Akron-JGanter-2855-Edit-2500.jpg?fit=1600%2C1055&ssl=1 1055 1600 Circle Blue https://www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Circle-of-Blue-Water-Speaks-600x139.png Circle Blue2022-05-03 08:01:362022-05-11 11:39:38Many Rural Towns Have Neglected Drinking Water Systems for Decades

Water Woes Loom for Michigan Suburbs, Towns After Decades of Disinvestment

May 3, 2022
Michigan cities rich and poor, big and small have been delaying maintenance on their water systems for decades. Now, even wealthy towns are suffering the consequences of past reluctance to pay for water system upkeep.
https://i0.wp.com/www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/IMG_4497.jpeg?fit=1600%2C1200&ssl=1 1200 1600 Circle Blue https://www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Circle-of-Blue-Water-Speaks-600x139.png Circle Blue2022-05-03 08:01:082022-05-11 12:15:59Water Woes Loom for Michigan Suburbs, Towns After Decades of Disinvestment

Michigan’s 20th Century Water Systems Too Big For Its Shrinking City Populations

May 3, 2022
Cities around the Great Lakes region struggle with the cost of water maintenance and operation as their populations decline.
https://i0.wp.com/www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Flint-Retrospective.00_04_41_00.Still010.jpg?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=1 720 1280 Circle Blue https://www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Circle-of-Blue-Water-Speaks-600x139.png Circle Blue2022-05-03 08:02:292022-05-11 12:28:31Michigan’s 20th Century Water Systems Too Big For Its Shrinking City Populations

Michigan’s Lack of Septic System Regulations is Causing Problems for Some of its Most Pristine Lakes

May 4, 2022
Failing systems can allow contaminated water to seep through the earth into nearby bodies of water.
https://i0.wp.com/www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/20211211_170039.jpg?fit=1600%2C720&ssl=1 720 1600 Circle Blue https://www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Circle-of-Blue-Water-Speaks-600x139.png Circle Blue2022-05-04 10:21:432022-05-11 12:33:40Michigan’s Lack of Septic System Regulations is Causing Problems for Some of its Most Pristine Lakes

Short-Changing Michigan Local Governments Has Resulted in Deteriorating Water Systems and Other Services

May 9, 2022
Many of Michigan’s 1,773 cities, villages, and townships are reaching a water infrastructure crisis point.
https://i0.wp.com/www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/DSC_4211.jpg?fit=1600%2C1068&ssl=1 1068 1600 Circle Blue https://www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Circle-of-Blue-Water-Speaks-600x139.png Circle Blue2022-05-09 10:44:502022-05-11 12:36:50Short-Changing Michigan Local Governments Has Resulted in Deteriorating Water Systems and Other Services

High Cost of Water Hits Home

May 10, 2022
Rising rates hurt the state’s poorest residents.
https://i0.wp.com/www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2022-04-14-Michigan-Waters-True-Cost-JGanter-1717-2500.jpg?fit=1600%2C1037&ssl=1 1037 1600 Brett Walton https://www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Circle-of-Blue-Water-Speaks-600x139.png Brett Walton2022-05-10 07:31:142022-12-09 10:35:15High Cost of Water Hits Home

Some Michigan Water Systems Are Overbuilt, Underfunded. Are Mergers The Answer?

May 11, 2022
Customers get cheaper, cleaner water when communities share the cost of infrastructure.
https://i0.wp.com/www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2022-04-15-Michigan-Waters-True-Cost-JGanter-2482-2500.jpg?fit=1600%2C959&ssl=1 959 1600 Circle Blue https://www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Circle-of-Blue-Water-Speaks-600x139.png Circle Blue2022-05-11 08:00:302022-05-11 12:42:00Some Michigan Water Systems Are Overbuilt, Underfunded. Are Mergers The Answer?
Brett Walton

Brett writes about agriculture, energy, infrastructure, and the politics and economics of water in the United States. He also writes the Federal Water Tap, Circle of Blue’s weekly digest of U.S. government water news. He is the winner of two Society of Environmental Journalists reporting awards, one of the top honors in American environmental journalism: first place for explanatory reporting for a series on septic system pollution in the United States(2016) and third place for beat reporting in a small market (2014). He received the Sierra Club’s Distinguished Service Award in 2018. Brett lives in Seattle, where he hikes the mountains and bakes pies. Contact Brett Walton

Related

Recent Posts

  • Road Salt, A Stealthy Pollutant, Is Damaging Michigan Waters
  • The Stream, January 25, 2023: Sediment Buildup Will Shrink Reservoir Storage, UN Study Shows
  • What’s Up With Water – January 24, 2023
  • Federal Water Tap, January 23: EPA Lists New Enforcement Priorities
  • The Stream, January 18, 2023: The Killing of Two Water Defenders in Honduras Prompts Calls for Justice

Subscribe: Weekly Waternews

* indicates required
Please also subscribe me to the daily Stream
Please also subscribe me to the Federal Water Tap

© 2023 Circle of Blue – all rights reserved
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

Donate to Circle of Blue
Some Michigan Water Systems Are Overbuilt, Underfunded. Are Mergers The Ans...Federal Water Tap, May 16: House Committee Alleges Criminal Activity Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

OKLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Accept settingsHide notification only
Make an impact this #GivingNewsDay
Journalism with this kind of impact is free to consume but costly to produce.
Support fact-based journalism with your tax-deductible donation
For a limited time, NewsMatch will match your gift, dollar for dollar
Support Independent Journalism
You have the power to inform the world's most important decisions
with your tax-deductible donation
 Twitter
 Facebook
 Reddit
 LinkedIn
 Copy
 Email
 

Loading Comments...