The Texas state water plan, released every five years, recommends spending $53 billion on hundreds of water infrastructure projects to ensure an adequate supply through 2060. The state, the Associated Press reports, is relying on municipal governments to carry out much of the plan. But with local budgets pinched and costs rising (the 2007 plan estimated a price tag of $31 billion), where will the money come from? To cope with the drought, one Texas town got a loan from the state to build a 12-mile pipeline.
It’s not just in Texas that infrastructure costs are being assessed. The American Society of Civil Engineers argues in a new report that the U.S. should invest an additional $84 billion in water infrastructure by the end of the decade to cover a gap in capital spending. The money, ASCE says, should go toward treatment plants, pipe replacement, and stormwater management. Read the full report here.
Elsewhere in Texas, the Austin American-Statesman reports on the growing number of private water utilities in the state and the frequent rate increases they are requesting.
A regional administrator with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency spoke with the Associated Press about the agency’s pending decision on pollution controls for an Arizona power plant that provides cheap water and power for the state’s residents. If the agency requires expensive technology, plant operators might decide to close the Navajo Generating Station.
Parts of Mexico are enduring their longest drought in 70 years, according to Agence France-Presse.